![]() Sussmann, who knew Joffe, brought the data to the attention of Clinton campaign general counsel and fellow Perkins Coie partner Marc Elias, who then got a small Washington-based research firm called Fusion GPS involved. Joffe purportedly discovered the server link after mining publicly available communications data. The server theory stemmed from a prominent cybersecurity expert, Rodney Joffe, who presented it to Sussmann. “It’s a waste of time and taxpayer money to allow Trump’s vendetta to continue to play out in our Justice system.” But if not, Garland should pull the plug, she added. ![]() “Obviously, not all of what Durham has been doing is public, so it’s possible there are real cases there,” Rodgers said. “Which, of course, raises the excellent question of why this case was brought in the first place?”ĭurham and Trump’s Justice Department appear to have been politically motivated to pursue the case, while Attorney General Merrick Garland likely felt compelled to let it proceed, rather than being accused of shutting the probe down for political reasons, she said. “False statement cases are notoriously difficult to win for the government,” especially since the evidence presented by prosecutors in this case was weak, Rodgers said. Read More: Prosecutors Struggle to Link Trump-Russia FBI Tip to Clintonįormer federal prosecutor Jennifer Rodgers said the verdict wasn’t a surprise to her. I also want to recognize and thank the investigators and the prosecution team for their dedicated efforts in seeking truth and justice in this case.” #Found not guilty trialSussmann’s trial was the first stemming from Special Counsel John Durham’s Trump-era probe into the conduct of the FBI’s broader Russia investigation, which the former president and his supporters have long called a “witch hunt.” Durham began looking into the origins of the FBI probe in May 2019, and before Tuesday, he’d gotten a guilty plea by a former FBI lawyer for falsifying a document.Īfter the verdict was read, Sussmann nodded his head, and then walked over to hug his children and his wife.ĭurham didn’t respond to questions as he left the courtroom, but issued an emailed statement: “While we are disappointed in the outcome, we respect the jury’s decision and thank them for their service. “Despite being falsely accused, I am relieved that justice ultimately prevailed in this case.” ![]() “I told the truth to the FBI, and the jury clearly recognized that with their unanimous verdict today,” Sussmann told reporters outside the courthouse. Sussmann’s lawyers said he’d offered the tip as a concerned citizen, not at the behest of the Clinton campaign. The agency debunked the theory, but not before the media held it out as possible evidence of collusion. ![]() His two-week trial rehashed bitter divisions between the rival presidential campaigns and shined a light on the dark side of opposition research.įBI officials said Sussmann falsely claimed he wasn’t representing a client when he handed over what he described as evidence of a suspicious communications link between computer servers at Trump Tower and a Russia-based bank tied to the Kremlin. The jury verdict in favor of Michael Sussmann, a prominent cybersecurity lawyer with deep ties to the Democratic party, was handed down Tuesday in Washington. A lawyer for Hillary Clinton’s 2016 presidential campaign was found not guilty of lying to the FBI about the identity of his client when he provided a faulty tip on then-candidate Donald Trump two months before the election. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |